The AI Operating Manual for WC Firms™
WCWorkersComp MarketingAI Institute™ The AI Operating Manual Plan your AI roadmap →
WorkersComp Marketing · AI Institute™Free Edition · v1.0
The AI Institute™ Volume VI · Handbook

The AI Operating Manual for Workers' Comp Law Firms

AI is not another software tool. It's a new operating layer for the modern firm — and this is the handbook for building on it, responsibly.

10Operating parts
10Proprietary frameworks
10AI workforce roles
1Readiness diagnostic
~75Minute read
For managing partners, COOs, ops & marketing directors, technology leaders — from AI beginners to experts.
Letter from the Founder

The goal isn't to adopt AI. It's to become intelligently AI-enabled.

There are two ways for a law firm to get AI wrong. The first is to ignore it and be out-operated by firms that didn't. The second — more common, and more expensive — is to adopt it indiscriminately: a dozen disconnected tools, a subscription no one uses, a chatbot that damages client trust. This handbook exists to chart the narrow, disciplined path between those two failures.

The premise is simple and, we think, correct: AI is not another item in the software budget. It's a new operating layer that sits underneath marketing, intake, legal work, and operations — and, deployed well, makes every one of them faster, cheaper, and more consistent. But "deployed well" is doing a lot of work in that sentence. AI should enhance, never replace, the professional judgment, legal expertise, empathy, and ethics that a client is actually paying for. Every implementation in this manual starts from a business problem, not a technology trend. That discipline is the whole difference between a firm that's AI-native and one that just bought AI.

So this is not an AI guide, a ChatGPT tutorial, or a prompt book. It's an operating manual: how to understand the technology in plain terms, where it creates real value department by department, how to build an AI workforce with proper boundaries and human oversight, how to govern it safely, and how to roll it out on a realistic timeline for a firm your size. It's written to be read by a managing partner who has never written a prompt and by a technology leader who writes them daily — and to be useful to both.

Read Part I to get fluent, then jump to the part that matches your next decision. Keep it beside you when you're evaluating a vendor, briefing your team, or writing the AI section of next year's plan.

— The founder, WorkersComp Marketing AI Institute™

The Core Idea

AI is a layer, not a tool. Build the stack in order.

The firms that struggle with AI treat it as a feature to bolt on. The firms that win treat it as a layer to build on — and, like any stack, the layers depend on each other. Skip a lower layer and everything above it wobbles. The AI Operating Stack™ is the order of operations.

The AI Operating Stack™
Five layers — build bottom-up; each enables the one above
LAYER 5
Strategic advantage
AI compounds into faster growth, lower cost, and a moat competitors can't quickly copy.
LAYER 4
AI workforce (agents)
Bounded, supervised AI roles handle repetitive work end-to-end — with escalation to humans.
LAYER 3
Workflows & automation
AI wired into real processes: intake response, follow-up, summaries, reporting.
LAYER 2
Data & knowledge
Clean, connected data and a firm knowledge base give AI something accurate to work from.
LAYER 1
Governance & foundations
Security, privacy, model choices, and human-oversight rules — the base everything sits on.
Most firms try to start at Layer 4 ("let's get an AI agent") without Layers 1–3, and it fails. Governance and data come first; agents and advantage are what they make possible.
The one rule that governs the whole manual

AI does the tireless, repetitive, time-sensitive work; humans keep the judgment, the empathy, and the final say. Every framework, agent, and roadmap that follows is an application of that single principle. If a proposed AI use would move judgment away from a qualified human on something that affects a client's case, that's not AI-native — that's negligent. The manual will keep drawing that line.

Book One

Foundations

Before deploying anything, a leader needs two things: a working mental model of what AI actually is, and a clear picture of what an AI-native firm looks like. Both, in plain language.

Part One · Understanding AI

What AI is — in executive language

You don't need to know how an engine is built to drive well. But you do need to know what it can and can't do. Here's the fluency a leader actually needs.

Modern AI is, at its core, a set of systems that predict and generate — text, decisions, actions — from patterns learned across enormous amounts of data. For a law firm, five capabilities matter. Understand these and you can evaluate any tool or vendor on the market.

Large language models (LLMs)

Systems that understand and generate human language — drafting, summarizing, answering, translating. The engine behind most firm-relevant AI. They're fluent, fast, and tireless — and confidently wrong when unchecked.

Reasoning models

A newer class that "thinks" step-by-step before answering, trading speed for accuracy on complex tasks. Worth the wait for analysis and multi-step decisions; overkill for a simple reply.

Multimodal AI

Models that handle images, documents, and audio, not just text — reading a medical record PDF, transcribing a call, describing a photo. Where much intake and legal-ops value lives.

AI agents

AI given a goal, tools, and boundaries so it can complete multi-step work — not just answer, but do. The basis of the AI workforce in Part VII. Powerful, and the layer that most needs guardrails.

Automation & workflows

The connective tissue that triggers AI at the right moment — a new lead arrives, AI responds; a call ends, AI summarizes. AI without automation is a smart tool no one remembers to use.

Knowledge retrieval (RAG)

Grounding AI in your documents and data so answers reflect your firm, your cases, your rules — not the open internet. The single biggest lever for accuracy and trust.

The limitations a leader must respect

AI's failure modes are as important as its powers. Four to hold in mind on every deployment:

Hallucination: models can state false things with total confidence — never let unreviewed AI output touch a legal filing or client.   Context limits: a model can only "hold" so much at once; feed it the right, scoped information.   No true understanding: it predicts plausible output, it doesn't know — judgment stays human.   Data sensitivity: what you put in matters (see Governance, Part VIII). Human oversight isn't a nicety; it's the design.

Part Two · The AI-Native Law Firm

What "AI-native" actually means

It's not the firm with the most AI tools. It's the firm whose leadership, culture, and systems are organized so AI makes everyone better — safely.

An AI-native firm isn't defined by its software. It's defined by how it operates: leaders who set AI direction, a culture that treats AI as a teammate rather than a threat, a connected tech stack, a living knowledge base, and client service that's faster without feeling automated. Most firms are somewhere on the road to that — and the AI Maturity Model™ tells them exactly where.

The WorkersComp AI Maturity Model™
Five stages from manual firm to AI-native — find yours, target the next
Stage 1
Manual

No meaningful AI use. Work is done by hand; the firm runs on effort and memory. Where most firms still are.

Stage 2
Experimenting

Individuals use AI ad hoc for drafts and one-off tasks. Real but scattered; no workflow impact, no governance.

Stage 3
Assisting

AI is embedded in a few real workflows (intake response, call summaries) with basic rules. The firm starts to feel faster.

Stage 4
Integrated

AI runs across departments with governance, human oversight, and measured KPIs. Bounded AI agents handle routine work end-to-end.

Stage 5
AI-Native

The firm is designed around the AI Operating Stack: agents, clean data, governance, and a compounding speed-and-cost advantage. The reference standard.

The valuable jump for most firms is Stage 2 → 3 — moving AI from scattered experiments into a few governed, measured workflows. That's where value first shows up, and it's the theme of Books Two and Three.
Culture is the real prerequisite

The technology is the easy part; the hard part is a team that trusts it. AI-native firms frame AI as something that removes drudgery so people can do the work they trained for — not as a cost-cutting threat. Leaders who introduce AI with their team, name a human owner for each use, and celebrate the hours it gives back get adoption. Leaders who impose it get quiet resistance and shelfware.

Book Two

AI Across the Firm

Where AI creates real, measurable value — department by department — and, just as importantly, where it must not go. Every application here starts from a business problem.

Part Three · Marketing

AI across the demand engine

Marketing is where AI adoption is easiest and the ROI is fastest — because the work is high-volume, measurable, and forgiving of a human final check.

AI won't replace your marketing strategy; it multiplies your marketing team's output. The pattern that works: AI produces the first draft and the analysis at scale; a human edits, approves, and keeps the brand voice. Here's where it earns its keep.

Content & SEO at scale

AI drafts county-level pages, FAQs, and answer-engine-ready content a human editor then sharpens — turning months of writing into weeks.

Creative & ad variants

Generate and iterate ad copy and creative concepts fast, feeding the continuous testing cadence that keeps CPL stable.

Analytics & reporting

AI summarizes performance, flags anomalies, and drafts the monthly report — so the team spends time deciding, not compiling.

Campaign optimization

AI surfaces which creative, audience, and channel are signing cases cheapest, accelerating the shift of budget toward what works.

The KPI that proves it

AI in marketing should show up as more output at stable quality and a falling cost per signed case — not just "we use AI now." If AI content isn't lowering cost per case or freeing senior time for higher-value work, the deployment is decorative. Measure it like any other investment. (For the full marketing benchmarks, see the Benchmark Report and State-of-the-Industry volumes.)

Part Four · Intake

The highest-value AI in the firm

Intake is time-sensitive, high-volume, and currently leaky — the perfect profile for AI. It's where AI most directly turns into signed cases.

A five-minute response makes a lead ~21× more likely to qualify.[1] AI is what lets a firm hit that standard every time, day or night — while a human still handles the moments that require warmth and judgment. The Human + AI Collaboration Framework™ makes the division of labor explicit, so speed never costs empathy.

The Human + AI Collaboration Framework™
Intake, divided by who does each part best

AI handles

  • Instant first response, 24/7
  • Basic qualification & routing
  • After-hours & overflow coverage
  • Missed-call callback triggers
  • Follow-up sequences over days
  • Call transcription & summaries
  • Document-collection reminders
  • Translation for Spanish-speaking callers

Humans handle

  • The empathetic, trust-building conversation
  • Judgment on complex or borderline cases
  • The actual sign-up & commitment
  • Anything emotionally sensitive
  • Final quality & accuracy checks
  • Escalations the AI flags

Together

  • AI drafts, human approves & sends
  • AI scores calls, human coaches
  • AI surfaces next best action, human decides
  • AI preps the file, human runs the meeting
  • AI flags risk, human judges it
The framework generalizes to every department in this book: give AI the tireless and repetitive, keep humans on judgment and relationship, and design the handoff between them deliberately.
Part Five · Legal Operations

The bright line: support vs. judgment

AI can dramatically accelerate the work around the law. It must never be allowed to practice it. This is the most important boundary in the manual.

In legal operations, the value is enormous and the risk is real, so the line has to be explicit. AI is a superb administrative and drafting assistant and a dangerous substitute for legal judgment. Every use below sits on one side of that line, and the side determines the level of human review required.

Legal operations — where AI belongs, and where it doesn't
AI-appropriate (administrative support)Human-only (legal judgment)
First-draft document generation (human-reviewed)Legal strategy & case theory
Summarizing case files & correspondenceAdvising the client on their options
Organizing & indexing medical recordsInterpreting medical evidence for the claim
Building chronologies & timelinesDeciding what the chronology means
Drafting routine client updates (approved)Any legal advice or assurance
Internal knowledge retrieval & research startsVerifying law & citations (always human)
Flagging deadlines & potential risksDeciding how to act on a risk
The non-negotiable rule

Every AI output that touches a legal matter is a draft for a qualified human to review — never a finished product. Hallucination makes unreviewed legal AI a malpractice risk, not a shortcut. The right- and left-hand columns above should be written into your AI governance policy (Part VIII) so the line is a rule, not a habit.

Part Six · Firm Operations

AI in the back office

The least glamorous AI wins are often the most reliable — the administrative load that quietly consumes a firm's leadership capacity.

Beyond marketing, intake, and legal work sits the operational machinery of the firm — finance, HR, knowledge, planning. AI removes friction here too, freeing leaders for the four jobs only they can do (see the CEO's Guide).

Finance & reporting

Automated dashboards, anomaly flags, and drafted board summaries — the numbers, ready to decide on.

HR & recruiting

Screening support, job-description drafts, and onboarding-content generation (human decisions preserved).

Knowledge management

A firm brain: instant, grounded retrieval of your SOPs, precedents, and policies for any staff member.

Meeting & board prep

AI assembles the pre-read, drafts the agenda, and captures action items — leadership shows up ready.

Project & vendor management

Status summaries, risk flags, and vendor-evaluation support keep initiatives on track without the busywork.

Strategic planning support

AI structures the analysis and scenarios; the leadership team supplies the judgment and the call.

Book Three

The Workforce & Governance

The two hardest — and highest-leverage — parts of going AI-native: building an AI workforce with real boundaries, and governing it so speed never compromises safety, privacy, or trust.

Part Seven · The AI Workforce

The AI Workforce Architecture™

Think of advanced AI not as software but as staff — a set of bounded, supervised roles, each with a job description, limits, and a human manager.

The most useful way to design AI agents is to write them like you'd write a role for a new hire: a clear purpose, defined responsibilities, explicit boundaries, and — non-negotiably — an escalation path and a human who owns the output. Below is a reference architecture of eight roles a workers'-comp firm can build toward. Each is a template, not a plug-in; adapt the boundaries to your firm and your governance (Part VIII).

Reception AIFirst contact, 24/7
DoesAnswers instantly, qualifies at a basic level, routes or books
BoundaryNo legal advice; no promises about case outcomes
EscalatesAnything complex or emotional → human intake
OversightIntake manager reviews transcripts & flags daily
Intake Coach AIQuality & training
DoesScores calls against a rubric, drafts coaching notes
BoundaryAdvises; never disciplines or evaluates formally
EscalatesRepeated low scores → team lead
OversightHuman coach delivers all feedback
Marketing Director AICampaign analysis
DoesMonitors performance, drafts reports, suggests reallocations
BoundaryRecommends; never spends budget autonomously
EscalatesBudget shifts > threshold → human approval
OversightMarketing lead approves every change
SEO Strategist AIContent & visibility
DoesFinds content gaps, drafts county/practice pages, structures for AI answers
BoundaryDrafts only; nothing publishes unreviewed
EscalatesLegal/claims accuracy questions → attorney
OversightEditor approves before publish
Case Coordinator AIFile movement
DoesSummarizes files, chases documents, flags deadlines & next steps
BoundaryAdministrative only; no legal decisions
EscalatesMissing deadline risk → case manager immediately
OversightCase manager owns every file
Knowledge Librarian AIThe firm brain
DoesAnswers staff questions from firm SOPs, precedents & policies
BoundaryGrounded in firm docs only; cites its source
Escalates"Not in the knowledge base" → owner, never guesses
OversightOps owns knowledge-base accuracy
Operations Analyst AIDashboards & anomalies
DoesCompiles KPIs, flags anomalies, drafts the weekly ops summary
BoundaryReports; doesn't change process
EscalatesMetric out of band → ops director
OversightOps director validates before action
Executive Advisor AIDecision support
DoesStructures options, models scenarios, pressure-tests a plan
BoundaryInforms the decision; never makes it
EscalatesN/A — always advisory to a human leader
OversightLeadership owns every decision
The rule for every agent: purpose, boundary, escalation, owner

No AI role goes live without all four defined. The boundary is what it must never do; the escalation is what it does when it hits the boundary; the owner is the named human accountable for its output. An agent without a boundary is a liability; an agent without an owner is an orphan. Deploy one role well before adding the next — start with Reception AI, the fastest, safest, highest-ROI place to begin.

Part Eight · AI Governance

The AI Governance Pyramid™

Governance isn't bureaucracy — it's what lets a firm move fast safely. Build it from the base up, and keep it practical enough that people actually follow it.

A workers'-comp firm handles sensitive medical and personal data and owes clients confidentiality and competence. That makes AI governance a professional obligation, not an IT afterthought. The AI Governance Pyramid™ orders it: get the foundation right first, and the higher layers become straightforward.

The AI Governance Pyramid™
Build from the base — each layer rests on the one below
ETHICS & ACCOUNTABILITY HUMAN REVIEW & QUALITY CONTROLS & POLICY SECURITY & DATA FOUNDATION
Base: security, privacy, confidentiality, access, data retention. Then: model selection, prompt management, audit logging, version control. Then: human review of all client/legal output, hallucination checks. Apex: ethics, compliance, accountability, and incident response.
The AI Governance Checklist0/8
  • Approved tools & models. A named list of what may be used — and what may not — for firm and client data.
  • Data rules. What client/medical data may go into which tools; what must never leave the firm.
  • Human-review requirement. All client-facing and legal output is reviewed by a qualified human before use.
  • Access control. Who can use which AI capabilities, tied to role.
  • Audit logging. A record of significant AI use for accountability and review.
  • Hallucination safeguards. Verification steps for anything factual, legal, or cited.
  • A named AI owner. One accountable person for AI policy, tools, and incidents.
  • Incident response. A simple plan for when AI gets something wrong — because eventually it will.

Consult your jurisdiction's rules of professional conduct and data-privacy obligations when writing your policy. This manual is guidance, not legal advice.

Book Four

Adoption & The Future

Everything above is only useful if it gets deployed. Here's how to roll it out on a realistic timeline for a firm your size — and where the whole thing is heading.

Part Nine · Implementation Roadmaps

Adoption, sized to your firm

A solo practice and a multi-office firm should not adopt AI the same way. Same principles, different pace and sequence.

Every roadmap follows the AI Operating Stack: governance and data first, then a workflow or two, then agents, then advantage. What changes with size is scope and speed. Start with the single highest-ROI move — AI instant lead response — and expand from proof, not from hype.

AI adoption roadmap by firm size
Firm sizeFirst 30 days90 days180 days → 1 year
SoloAI instant response + a written data ruleAI follow-up & call summariesKnowledge base; one or two agents
Small (2–10)Governance basics + Reception AIIntake coaching AI; marketing content AIIntegrated stack; Case Coordinator AI
Mid-sizedGovernance policy + named AI ownerMulti-department workflows; KPIs liveMultiple governed agents; ops dashboards
Multi-office / EnterpriseFormal governance + risk registerStandardized AI workflows across officesFull AI workforce; predictive analytics; annual review cadence
Change management is the hidden variable

Whatever your size, the roadmap succeeds or fails on adoption, not technology. Budget for training, name owners, pilot with willing early adopters, measure the hours saved, and share the wins. Every roadmap should carry a risk register (in the toolkit) and a rollback plan. Go one proven step at a time — an AI initiative that no one trusts or uses is worse than none, because it burns the credibility you'll need for the next one.

Part Ten · The Future

Preparing for the decade

The specific tools will change every few months. The direction won't. Build for where this is going, not for this quarter's model release.

Over the next decade, AI-native operations will move from advantage to baseline; search will keep shifting from links to AI answers; client expectations will keep rising toward instant, transparent, always-on service; and more of the routine work of a firm will be handled by supervised AI, freeing lawyers to do more of what only lawyers can. None of this removes the human core of the work — it raises the premium on it.

The durable strategy

Don't chase models; build the stack. A firm with clean data, real governance, disciplined workflows, and a culture that trusts AI will absorb whatever comes next — better models, new agents, new channels — because the foundation is ready. The firms that win the decade won't be the ones that adopted the most AI fastest; they'll be the ones that adopted it most intelligently, kept humans at the center, and never lost their clients' trust in the process. That's the whole thesis of this manual.

The Tools · Executive Toolkit

The AI Executive Toolkit

The frameworks made usable — a prioritization matrix, a model-selection guide, and a vendor scorecard for your next AI decision.

T.1The AI Opportunity Matrix™

Score every candidate AI initiative on two axes — business impact and implementation effort — and let the quadrant tell you what to do. Start top-left, be selective top-right, skip bottom-right.

The AI Opportunity Matrix™
Impact vs. effort — where to start, and what to avoid
QUICK WINS BIG BETS FILL-INS AVOID EFFORT → IMPACT → AI instant response Call summaries Follow-up automation AI workforce (agents) Firm knowledge base Meeting-notes AI Custom model training
Quick Wins (high impact, low effort) fund and prove the program — start here. Big Bets (high impact, high effort) are worth it, sequenced. Fill-ins are optional. "Avoid" = high effort, low impact (most firms should not train custom models). Positions are illustrative.

T.2The Model Selection Guide

If the task is…Choose…Because
High-volume, simple (replies, summaries)A fast, efficient modelSpeed & cost matter more than depth
Complex analysis or multi-step reasoningA reasoning modelAccuracy is worth the extra time/cost
Documents, images, medical recordsA multimodal modelIt can read more than text
Anything with firm/client dataA tool with strong data protectionsConfidentiality is non-negotiable
Answers grounded in your docsA tool with retrieval (RAG)Reduces hallucination; cites sources

T.3The AI Vendor Evaluation Scorecard

Before you buy any AI tool0/7
  • Data handling. Where does our data go, is it used for training, and can we delete it?
  • Security & compliance. Encryption, access controls, and relevant certifications.
  • A real business problem. Which specific problem does this solve, and how will we measure it?
  • Integration. Does it connect to our existing stack, or create another silo?
  • Human oversight. Can we keep a human in the loop where it matters?
  • Total cost & adoption. Real cost including training and the effort to get the team using it.
  • Exit. Can we leave and take our data with us?
The Tools · Interactive

The AI Readiness Diagnostic

Score your firm across the five layers of the AI Operating Stack and find your maturity stage — in two minutes.

Rate each dimension honestly, from Not started to AI-native. Your composite maps to the AI Maturity Model™ stage — and your lowest layer is where the Operating Stack tells you to build next. Runs entirely in your browser; nothing is stored.

AI Readiness Diagnostic™0 = Not started · 50 = Integrated · 100 = AI-native. Your weakest layer is your next move.
0/ 100
Rate the layers to begin
Your AI maturity stage and next move will appear here.
Reference

Frameworks, Prompts, Glossary & References

The reusable IP, a starter prompt library, and the reference apparatus.

A.1The frameworks in this manual

WorkersComp Marketing AI frameworks
FrameworkWhat it doesWhere
The AI Operating Stack™The five layers of AI adoption, built bottom-upCore Idea
The WorkersComp AI Maturity Model™Five stages from Manual to AI-NativePart II
The Human + AI Collaboration Framework™Who does what — AI, human, togetherPart IV
The AI Workforce Architecture™Eight bounded, supervised AI rolesPart VII
The AI Governance Pyramid™Four layers of safe, practical governancePart VIII
The AI Opportunity Matrix™Prioritize initiatives by impact vs. effortToolkit
The AI Readiness Assessment™ / Value Score™Score readiness & maturity liveDiagnostic

A.2A starter prompt library

Production-ready starting points. Adapt to your firm, ground them in your data, and keep a human reviewing the output — every prompt below produces a draft, not a final.

01 · Intake call summary

Summarize this intake call transcript [paste] into: (1) caller name & contact, (2) injury type & date, (3) employer, (4) key facts, (5) red flags or missing info, (6) recommended next step. Flag anything requiring attorney judgment. Do not give legal advice.

02 · County landing-page draft

Draft a workers'-comp landing page for injured workers in [county, state]. Cover: what to do after a workplace injury, common local industries, benefits available, and why to act fast. Plain, empathetic, 6th-grade reading level. Mark any claim that needs legal review. Output as structured sections.

03 · Weekly performance report

From this campaign data [paste], write a 1-page executive summary: cost per lead, cost per signed case, week-over-week change, the top anomaly, and one recommended action. Lead with the number that matters most to profit.

04 · AI governance policy starter

Draft an AI usage policy for a workers'-comp law firm covering: approved tools, data rules (esp. client/medical data), mandatory human review of legal/client output, access control, and incident response. Practical and scalable for a [size] firm. Note: for review by counsel, not final.

GGlossary

LLM (large language model)
An AI system that understands and generates human language — the engine behind most firm-relevant AI.
Reasoning model
An AI that works step-by-step before answering, trading speed for accuracy on complex tasks.
Multimodal AI
AI that handles images, documents, and audio in addition to text.
AI agent
AI given a goal, tools, and boundaries so it can complete multi-step work with human oversight.
RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)
Grounding AI in your own documents so answers reflect your firm and cite their source.
Hallucination
When an AI states something false with confidence — the reason human review is mandatory.
Context window
How much information a model can consider at once; exceed it and quality drops.
Human-in-the-loop
A design where a qualified human reviews or approves AI output before it's used.
AI-native firm
A firm organized around the AI Operating Stack so AI safely improves every function.

RReferences

  1. Oldroyd, J. B. et al. (MIT / InsideSales.com), Lead Response Management Study — the ~5-minute response window and its effect on lead qualification.
  2. WordStream, 2025 Google Ads Benchmarks — Attorneys & Legal Services (legal CPL $131.63). wordstream.com
  3. WorkersComp Marketing managed portfolio (aggregated, de-identified): $16.5M spend, 219,000 leads, 21,000 signed cases. Representative, not guarantees.
  4. Companion volumes: the Benchmark Report 2026, State of WC Marketing 2027, and Industry Report 2026 (Research Institute™) — for the marketing data this manual references.

This manual is guidance for firm leaders, not legal, financial, or technology-procurement advice. AI capabilities and tools change rapidly; verify current model capabilities and your professional-conduct obligations before deploying. Human review of AI output affecting client matters is required, not optional.

✦Build your AI-native firm — with a partner who's done it

This manual is the map. When you want help building the stack — responsibly, and measured to signed cases — that's what we do, exclusively for workers'-comp firms.

$16.5MManaged spend
219,000Leads~$75 CPL
21,000Signed cases~$775 per case